[libvirt] [PATCH] Deal with gnutls 3.5.6 regression

Ján Tomko jtomko at redhat.com
Wed Dec 14 10:01:10 UTC 2016


On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:15:12AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>Anyone want to review this, if not I'll just claim its a build
>breaker fix...
>
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:56:43AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 12:04:36PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> > I was not originally planning to do anything for the gnutls 3.5.6
>> > regression:
>> >
>> >   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-November/msg00816.html
>> >
>> > but there's still no immediate sign of the new 3.5.7 release,
>> > so while I still don't want to workaround the bug in libvirt,
>> > we can at least blacklist that version of gnutls in the test
>> > suite, so 'make check' passes on affected systems while we're
>> > waiting for 3.5.7 to arrive.
>>
>> 3.5.7 has just hit Fedora updates-testing, but I figure we
>> might as well still blacklist 3.5.6 in our tests
>

Isn't the point of the test suite to also fail on broken systems?

Jan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20161214/82e4c09e/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list