[libvirt] [PATCH 2/6] storage:dir: .deleteVol callback for ploop volume
Olga Krishtal
okrishtal at virtuozzo.com
Wed Feb 10 12:41:51 UTC 2016
On 10/02/16 12:43, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
>
> On 09.02.2016 16:52, Olga Krishtal wrote:
>> Deletes whole directory of a ploop volume. To delete ploop image it has
>> to be unmounted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Olga Krishtal <okrishtal at virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 6 ++++++
>> src/storage/storage_backend.h | 2 ++
>> src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend.c b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> index 039a540..34c9d40 100644
>> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> @@ -871,6 +871,12 @@ int virStorageBackendCreatePloop(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +int virStorageBackendDeletePloop(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> + virStorageVolDefPtr vol)
>> +{
>> + return virFileDeleteTree(vol->target.path);
>> +}
>> +
>> enum {
>> QEMU_IMG_BACKING_FORMAT_NONE = 0,
>> QEMU_IMG_BACKING_FORMAT_FLAG,
>> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend.h b/src/storage/storage_backend.h
>> index 852d6ed..7d354c5 100644
>> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend.h
>> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend.h
>> @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ int virStorageBackendCreatePloop(virConnectPtr conn,
>> virStorageVolDefPtr inputvol,
>> unsigned int flags);
>>
>> +int virStorageBackendDeletePloop(virConnectPtr conn,
>> + virStorageVolDefPtr vol);
>>
>> virStorageBackendBuildVolFrom
>> virStorageBackendGetBuildVolFromFunction(virStorageVolDefPtr vol,
>> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
>> index 80c7e9e..2290096 100644
>> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
>> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_fs.c
>> @@ -1245,6 +1245,11 @@ virStorageBackendFileSystemVolDelete(virConnectPtr conn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
>> switch ((virStorageVolType) vol->type) {
>> case VIR_STORAGE_VOL_FILE:
>> case VIR_STORAGE_VOL_DIR:
>> + if (vol->target.format == VIR_STORAGE_FILE_PLOOP) {
>> + if (virStorageBackendDeletePloop(conn, vol) < 0)
>> + return -1;
>> + break;
> break at this level is not easy to follow.
> Can we introduce a function which will have another switch inside
> for types of volume types?
If I introduce one more function, we will suffer from one extra call
every vol-delete call.
Moreover, it won't change the appearance:
case VIR_STORAGE_VOL_FILE:
case VIR_STORAGE_VOL_DIR:
+ if (!extra_switch_func()) {
+ return -1;
+ break
So, it looks the same.
>> + }
>> if (virFileRemove(vol->target.path, vol->target.perms->uid,
>> vol->target.perms->gid) < 0) {
>> /* Silently ignore failures where the vol has already gone away */
>>
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list