[libvirt] LSN-2016-0001 - Authentication disabled when setting empty VNC password

Martin Kletzander mkletzan at redhat.com
Fri Jul 1 12:01:01 UTC 2016


On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:31:33AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>        Libvirt Security Notice: LSN-2016-0001
>        ======================================
>
>       Summary: Authentication disabled when setting empty VNC
>                password
>   Reported on: 20130531
>  Published on: 20130531
>      Fixed on: 20160630
>   Reported by: Vivian Zhang <vivianzhang at redhat.com>
>                Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net>
>    Patched by: Jiri Denemar <jdenemar at redhat.com>
>      See also: CVE-2016-5008
>
>      Branch: v1.3.1-maint
>   Broken in: v1.3.3.1
>   Broken by: 9d73efdbe3ea61a13a11fdc24a2cb530eaa0b66f
>    Fixed by: 2d5370eba6b52f44cf832eba28f162c55331a47c
>
>      Branch: v1.3.3-maint
>   Broken in: v1.3.3.1
>   Broken by: 9d73efdbe3ea61a13a11fdc24a2cb530eaa0b66f
>    Fixed by: 881441f84a30cd3921df313a982f7162d7ca04f4
>

I just want to make sure my guess is right.  We don't have 1.3.2-maint
branch, so it wasn't back-ported there.  Does that mean we will never
need such branch, hence we're fine; or does it mean that we should add a
branch for the CVE fix just in case someone wants to back-port other fix
to 1.3.2 and creates it -- so that it is not vulnerable?

My guess is that we won't have 1.3.2 but we should rather be safe...

Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20160701/95592f34/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list