[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] any better way to treat device-detach timeout ?



On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:26:23 +0000, Zhangbo (Oscar) wrote:
> After rethinking, I guess there's still a problem:
> 
>    Suggest that 
>    1 the device got detached in qemu after 10 secs,
>    2 the func virDomainDetachDeviceFlags() has already returned success in the 5th second. Libvirt won't wait for the DEVICE_DELETED event after then.
>    3 the 'def' has the device untouched
>    4 thus, 10 secs later, the device is detached successfully in qemu, but libvirt has the device un-detached in def(transient XML).

Do you have an evidence (logs) of this happening? Such behavior would be
a bug since libvirt always listens to DEVICE_DELETED event and acts on
it even if virDomainDetachDeviceFlags already returned.

Jirka


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]