[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[libvirt] 答复: any better way to treat de vice-detach timeout ?



>
>On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:26:23 +0000, Zhangbo (Oscar) wrote:
>> After rethinking, I guess there's still a problem:
>>
>>    Suggest that
>>    1 the device got detached in qemu after 10 secs,
>>    2 the func virDomainDetachDeviceFlags() has already returned success in
>the 5th second. Libvirt won't wait for the DEVICE_DELETED event after then.
>>    3 the 'def' has the device untouched
>>    4 thus, 10 secs later, the device is detached successfully in qemu, but
>libvirt has the device un-detached in def(transient XML).
>
>Do you have an evidence (logs) of this happening? Such behavior would be
>a bug since libvirt always listens to DEVICE_DELETED event and acts on
>it even if virDomainDetachDeviceFlags already returned.
>
>Jirka
>
>--


Wrong test, sorry for bothering! :)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]