[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] nodedev: Expose PCI header type



On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:37:55PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:23:30PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
If we expose this information, which is one byte in every PCI config
file, we let all mgmt apps know whether the device itself is an endpoint
or not so it's easier for them to decide whether such device can be
passed through into a VM (endpoint) or not (*-bridge).

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317531

Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan redhat com>
---
 docs/schemas/nodedev.rng                           | 17 ++++++++++
 src/conf/node_device_conf.c                        | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++
 src/conf/node_device_conf.h                        |  2 ++
 src/libvirt_private.syms                           |  3 ++
 src/node_device/node_device_udev.c                 |  5 +++
 src/util/virpci.c                                  | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/util/virpci.h                                  | 12 +++++++
 .../pci_0000_00_02_0_header_type.xml               | 16 +++++++++
 .../pci_0000_00_1c_0_header_type.xml               | 22 +++++++++++++
 tests/nodedevxml2xmltest.c                         |  2 ++
 10 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_00_02_0_header_type.xml
 create mode 100644 tests/nodedevschemadata/pci_0000_00_1c_0_header_type.xml

diff --git a/docs/schemas/nodedev.rng b/docs/schemas/nodedev.rng
index 744dccdf5fa9..7aec2adf48e9 100644
--- a/docs/schemas/nodedev.rng
+++ b/docs/schemas/nodedev.rng
@@ -169,6 +169,23 @@
     </optional>

     <optional>
+      <element name='header'>
+        <attribute name='type'>
+          <choice>
+            <value>endpoint</value>
+            <value>pci-bridge</value>
+            <value>cardbus-bridge</value>
+          </choice>
+        </attribute>

We already have nested <capability> elements in the node device
data, and reporting this header type just looks like another
set of capabilities to me. ie <capability type='endpoint'/>


But the devices that this is valid for are exactly only PCI ones.  And
all PCI ones.  That's why I included it in capability type='pci'.  It's
not capability by itself, it's just information extracted from one Byte
in PCI config.

+        <optional>
+          <element name='multifunction'>

Your commit message mentioned nothing about adding a <multifunction/>
element. It looks tangential to the goal of adding info about the
device type, so should be a separate patch.


OK, I should've explained it more clearly.  This information is taken
from the first bit of the PCI config header type field.  That's what I
meant in the commit message as exposing all the information we can get
from that one Byte as it's part of that.  That's also why that element
is included *inside* the header element as it's part of that information.

In any case we already have a


   <capability type='virt_functions'>
     <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x10' function='0x0'/>
     <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x10' function='0x4'/>
     <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x11' function='0x0'/>
     <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x05' slot='0x11' function='0x4'/>
   </capability>

which is reported against physical functions. What's missing
is that we omit the capability entirely if no functions are
currently enabled. We also don't report the total number of
functions that are possible. IMHO we should address it those
problems rather than addign a new element.


The 'multifunction' element I added has nothing to do with virtual
functions.  It merely indicates that the physical device is supposed to
be multifunction; as in there is another device with the same address,
but different value of 'function' part of that address.

I think explaining all this in the commit message would be enough as I
believe the patch is still correct.  Let me know if that's fine or if I
misunderstood, thanks.


Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]