[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu-agent: remove redundant comments

[Andrea Bolognani]

On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 16:19 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:17:35PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 17:16 +0800, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
> > > 
> > > At 2016-05-10 15:17:48, "Chen Hanxiao" <chen_han_xiao at 126.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > > From: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao at gmail.com>
> > > >  
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao at gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > src/qemu/qemu_agent.c | 11 -----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> > > >  
> > > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c b/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
> > > > index c55f304..20597b4 100644
> > > > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
> > > > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_agent.c
> > > > @@ -287,17 +287,6 @@ qemuAgentIOProcessEvent(qemuAgentPtr mon,
> > > >          return -1;
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > > -/*
> > > > -    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_CARDINALITY(eventHandlers); i++) {
> > > > -        if (STREQ(eventHandlers[i].type, type)) {
> > > > -            virJSONValuePtr data = virJSONValueObjectGet(obj, "data");
> > > > -            VIR_DEBUG("handle %s handler=%p data=%p", type,
> > > > -                      eventHandlers[i].handler, data);
> > > > -            (eventHandlers[i].handler)(mon, data);
> > > > -            break;
> > > > -        }
> > > > -    }
> > > > -*/
> > > >      return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >  
> > This chunk is referenced near the top of the file:
> > 
> > > 
> > > /* When you are the first to uncomment this,
> > >   * don't forget to uncomment the corresponding
> > >   * part in qemuAgentIOProcessEvent as well.
> > >   *
> > > static struct {
> > >      const char *type;
> > >      void (*handler)(qemuAgentPtr mon, virJSONValuePtr data);
> > > } eventHandlers[] = {
> > > };
> > > */
> > 
> > Looks like we haven't felt the need to enable it in
> > about five years, so maybe we can just get rid of it.
> > 
> > CC'ing Dan, who wrote the code.
> 
> I only wrote the monitor code, not the agent code. This just looks like
> it was copied from the monitor code to prepare us for a future where the
> agent starts sending events. Personally I'd just leave all this code
> as-is.

I guess that's a NACK then. Sorry, Chen! 

-- 
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team