[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv2 3/3] security: label the slic_table



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 16:53:25 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 20:01:18 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > Add support for the slic_table to the security drivers.
> 
> In this case, you should add a note to the documentation that the file
> is not treated as shared and should be copied for every VM to avoid
> problems as with shared kernel files.
> 
> > ---
> >  src/security/security_dac.c     | 5 +++++
> >  src/security/security_selinux.c | 5 +++++
> >  src/security/virt-aa-helper.c   | 4 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)a
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/security/security_dac.c b/src/security/security_dac.c
> > index df3ed47..442ce70 100644
> > --- a/src/security/security_dac.c
> > +++ b/src/security/security_dac.c
> > @@ -1218,6 +1218,11 @@ virSecurityDACSetAllLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
> >                                     def->os.dtb, user, group) < 0)
> >          return -1;
> >  
> > +    if (def->os.slic_table &&
> > +        virSecurityDACSetOwnership(priv, NULL,
> > +                                   def->os.slic_table, user, group) < 0)
> > +        return -1;
> > +
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> All 3 security driver IMPLs are missing addition to
> virSecurity.*RestoreAllLabel.

I've noticed that they are actually considered shared, thus ACK without
any change.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]