[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] news: document libxl tunnelled migration support

On 02/15/2017 05:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
On 02/15/2017 11:41 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Joao Martins wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao m martins oracle com>
 docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml
index b756a97..b0629b5 100644
--- a/docs/news.xml
+++ b/docs/news.xml
@@ -53,6 +53,16 @@
           was <code>virtio-net</code>.
+      <change>
+        <summary>
+          libxl: add tunnelled migration support
+        </summary>
+        <description>
+          Add tunnelled migration to libxl driver, which is always capable of
+          strong encryption and doesn't require any extra network connection
+          other than what's required for remote access of libvirtd.
+        </description>
+      </change>
     <section title="Improvements">

Pushed, but only after realizing tunneled is misspelled :-(. No use perpetuating
the misspelling of tunneled, so I've pushed a trivial followup.

Interesting, I didn't know that. Greping the whole repo for "tunnelled" and you
will find a *lot* of matches:

$ git grep tunneled | wc -l
$ git grep tunnelled | wc -l

So the incorrect spelling is used over 100x more than the correct one :-)

Hmm, but the internets aren't really clear. Some hits say tunneled vs tunnelled
being both correct.

Heh, as a native speaker I'm not sure which spelling is correct, but seem to recall a prior discussion on the list proclaiming 'tunneled'. If folks prefer I can revert the s/tunnelled/tunneled/ commit.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]