[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[libvirt] [PATCH 5/7] virNodeDeviceObjList: Derive from virObjectRWLockable



There is no reason why two threads trying to look up
two node devices should mutually exclude each other. Utilize
new virObjectRWLockable that was just introduced.

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn redhat com>
---
 src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
index 3ab93a3ea..808365e21 100644
--- a/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
+++ b/src/conf/virnodedeviceobj.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct _virNodeDeviceObj {
 };
 
 struct _virNodeDeviceObjList {
-    virObjectLockable parent;
+    virObjectRWLockable parent;
 
     /* name string -> virNodeDeviceObj mapping
      * for O(1), lockless lookup-by-name */
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjOnceInit(void)
                                               virNodeDeviceObjDispose)))
         return -1;
 
-    if (!(virNodeDeviceObjListClass = virClassNew(virClassForObjectLockable(),
+    if (!(virNodeDeviceObjListClass = virClassNew(virClassForObjectRWLockable(),
                                                   "virNodeDeviceObjList",
                                                   sizeof(virNodeDeviceObjList),
                                                   virNodeDeviceObjListDispose)))
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListSearch(virNodeDeviceObjListPtr devs,
 {
     virNodeDeviceObjPtr obj;
 
-    virObjectLock(devs);
+    virObjectLockRead(devs);
     obj = virHashSearch(devs->objs, callback, data, NULL);
     virObjectRef(obj);
     virObjectUnlock(devs);
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListFindByName(virNodeDeviceObjListPtr devs,
 {
     virNodeDeviceObjPtr obj;
 
-    virObjectLock(devs);
+    virObjectLockRead(devs);
     obj = virNodeDeviceObjListFindByNameLocked(devs, name);
     virObjectUnlock(devs);
     if (obj)
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListNew(void)
     if (virNodeDeviceObjInitialize() < 0)
         return NULL;
 
-    if (!(devs = virObjectLockableNew(virNodeDeviceObjListClass)))
+    if (!(devs = virObjectRWLockableNew(virNodeDeviceObjListClass)))
         return NULL;
 
     if (!(devs->objs = virHashCreate(50, virObjectFreeHashData))) {
@@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListNumOfDevices(virNodeDeviceObjListPtr devs,
     struct virNodeDeviceCountData data = {
         .conn = conn, .aclfilter = aclfilter, .matchstr = cap, .count = 0 };
 
-    virObjectLock(devs);
+    virObjectLockRead(devs);
     virHashForEach(devs->objs, virNodeDeviceObjListNumOfDevicesCallback, &data);
     virObjectUnlock(devs);
 
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListGetNames(virNodeDeviceObjListPtr devs,
         .conn = conn, .aclfilter = aclfilter, .matchstr = cap, .names = names,
         .nnames = 0, .maxnames = maxnames, .error = false };
 
-    virObjectLock(devs);
+    virObjectLockRead(devs);
     virHashForEach(devs->objs, virNodeDeviceObjListGetNamesCallback, &data);
     virObjectUnlock(devs);
 
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ virNodeDeviceObjListExport(virConnectPtr conn,
         .conn = conn, .aclfilter = aclfilter, .flags = flags,
         .devices = NULL, .ndevices = 0, .error = false };
 
-    virObjectLock(devs);
+    virObjectLockRead(devs);
     if (devices &&
         VIR_ALLOC_N(data.devices, virHashSize(devs->objs) + 1) < 0) {
         virObjectUnlock(devs);
-- 
2.13.0


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]