[libvirt] [PATCH 1/1] Enable Travis CI build status icon

[Daniel P. Berrange]

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:24:41PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:35:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:30:00PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 02:39:28PM -0300, Claudio André wrote:
> > > > Using GitHub libvirt site, it is possible to show Travis's fancy icon of the current build status. It highlights the QA process.
> > > 
> > > I like seeing the icon there.  It's very quick reference that serves the
> > > purpose.
> > > 
> > > There's no need for a cover letter when sending one patch.
> > > 
> > > > ---
> > > > README.md | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 README.md
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..a609286
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/README.md
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > > +## *LibVirt: the virtualization API* [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/libvirt/libvirt.svg)](https://travis-ci.org/libvirt/libvirt)
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > I don't care about the number of (sub-)s in 'sub-heading', but why
> > > making it italic as well?  ACK without the italic.  Will push this in a
> > > while.  Thanks.
> > > 
> > > > +  Libvirt is a C toolkit to interact with the virtualization capabilities
> > > > +of recent versions of Linux (and other OSes). It is free software
> > > > +available under the GNU Lesser General Public License. Virtualization of
> > > > +the Linux Operating System means the ability to run multiple instances of
> > > > +Operating Systems concurrently on a single hardware system where the basic
> > > > +resources are driven by a Linux instance. The library aim at providing
> > > > +long term stable C API initially for the Xen paravirtualization but
> > > > +should be able to integrate other virtualization mechanisms if needed.
> > > > +
> > > > +Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com>
> > 
> > This just duplicates the existing README file content. If we're going todo
> > this we should just make README a symlink to README.md or vica-verca.
> > 
> 
> What space would we save by that?  I don't think people would be
> confused by the icon text in the readme, so I don't really care.  So I
> can add one more patch after this or squash it in:

I wasn't meaning for sake of saving space, but rather ensuring the content
is always in sync. For that matter our README file is awful and we should
put some useful content in it:-)



Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|