[libvirt] [PATCH v2 1/5] configure: Require GnuTLS

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Tue Jun 5 17:03:21 UTC 2018


On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 06:50:53PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 14:38 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 06/05/2018 02:04 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:55:54PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > > We are building with GnuTLS everywhere because GnuTLS is widely
> > > > available. Also, it is desirable to prefer cryptographically
> > > > strong PRNG over "/dev/urandom" which is just a fallback.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  configure.ac      | 2 --
> > > >  m4/virt-gnutls.m4 | 4 ----
> > > >  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
> > 
> > Thanks, I've pushed these.
> 
> Well, this is awkward:
> 
>   https://ci.centos.org/view/libvirt/job/libvirt-master-build-website/124/systems=libvirt-centos-6/console
> 
> We don't actually build libvirt on CentOS 6 anymore, just the
> documentation and release archives, ie. what's necessary to keep
> libvirt.org (which is still on that OS) running; still, after this
> patch the configure step will very understandably fail, and I can't
> imagine things going over much better on the actual live instance
> of the website: no nightlies[1] today, I'm afraid!
> 
> I'm likewise afraid I don't have any bright ideas on how to solve
> this, so any input on the matter will be very much appreciated.

We can't use docker on centos6 either and believe it or not the host
doesn't have hardware virt either.

I could possibly setup libvirt lxc to run the jobs though.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list