[libvirt] [PATCHv3 00/13] Switch from yajl to Jansson

[Daniel P. Berrangé]

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 02:03:12PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:46:57AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > "xenial" (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS) support has been in the works for a
> > > long time: it was "just around the corner" last December[1], but
> > > it's six months (and one more Ubuntu LTS release) later now and
> > > it still hasn't materialized; that, along with the fact that just
> > > a couple of months ago[2] the folks at Travis were "super excited"
> > > to introduce "trusty" (Ubuntu 14.04 LTS) to their Enterprise
> > > offering makes it very hard for me to believe we will be able to
> > > run builds on 16.04 anytime soon.
> > 
> > I just had a chat with spice folks and learnt that gitlab.com provides
> > a CI system with free shared runners. The key difference from travis,
> > is that gitlab supports a choice of docker images to use, but does not
> > support os-x.
> > 
> > So we could drop ubuntu from travis, leaving just the os-x builder,
> > and enable use of some docker images under gitlab, to get an equiv
> > level of coverage.
> 
> Why don't we just add Ubuntu 16.04 and Ubuntu 18.04 workers to the
> CentOS CI environment? I'd rather avoid fracturing our CI efforts
> further.

The CentOS CI runs post-merge, while the travis CI can run pre-merge
on developer's branches. It is also pushing capacity of the CentOS
CI host to add another 2 VMs to it. 

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|