[libvirt] [PATCH] test: Remove possible infinite loop in virnetsockettest

John Ferlan jferlan at redhat.com
Tue Sep 11 14:20:35 UTC 2018



On 09/11/2018 07:19 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09/07/2018 02:26 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Commit 39015a6f3 modified the test to be more reliable/realistic,
>> but without checking the return status of virEventRunDefaultImpl
>> it's possible that the test could run infinitely.
>>
>> Found by Coverity
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  tests/virnetsockettest.c | 9 +++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/virnetsockettest.c b/tests/virnetsockettest.c
>> index cccb90d0be..490f720fd0 100644
>> --- a/tests/virnetsockettest.c
>> +++ b/tests/virnetsockettest.c
>> @@ -243,8 +243,13 @@ testSocketAccept(const void *opaque)
>>                          &cdata) < 0)
>>          goto cleanup;
>>  
>> -    while (rsock == NULL)
>> -        virEventRunDefaultImpl();
>> +    while (rsock == NULL) {
>> +        if (virEventRunDefaultImpl() < 0) {
>> +            VIR_WARN("Failed to run event loop: %s\n",
>> +                     virGetLastErrorMessage());
> 
> The libvirt error is dispatched in case of error. Do we need this
> VIR_WARN() then?
> 

Probably not, especially since it's only a test...  Guess I was being
over paranoid.  I'll remove before pushing...

Tks,

John

>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>>  
>>      for (i = 0; i < nlsock; i++) {
>>          if (lsock[i] == rsock) {
>>
> 
> 
> ACK regardless.
> 
> Michal
> 




More information about the libvir-list mailing list