[libvirt] [PATCH] doc: vtpm only support secrets by UUID at this point

[Christophe de Dinechin]

> On 10 Dec 2019, at 16:08, marcandre.lureau at redhat.com wrote:
> 
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at redhat.com>
> 
> Support by usage name can be considered separately (with a 'usage'
> attribute?).
> 
> Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau at redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/formatsecret.html.in | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/formatsecret.html.in b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> index 8d0630a7c3..8f5383cf64 100644
> --- a/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> @@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ Secret value set
>       of the vTPM.
>       The <code><usage type='vtpm'></code> element must contain
>       a single <code>name</code> element that specifies a usage name
> -      for the secret.  The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID or by
> -      this usage name via the <code><encryption></code> element of
> +      for the secret.  The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID
> +      via the <code><encryption></code> element of
>       a <a href="formatdomain.html#elementsTpm">tpm</a> when using an
>       emulator.
>       <span class="since">Since 5.6.0</span>. The following is an example
> -- 
> 2.24.0.308.g228f53135a

Reminds me of our discussion :-)

Reviewed-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin at redhat.com>

> 
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list