[libvirt] [PATCH v6 0/9] Incremental backups, focus on API

[Peter Krempa]

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:13:44 -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm fairly confident that these API are ready to go (that is, I've got
> qemu code in the wings to implement these API for the qemu driver, as
> demonstrated at last KVM forum, and it shouldn't be too hard to add
> support in the test driver to get some 'make check' coverage similar
> to what I recently added for snapshots). I'm hoping the APIs make it
> in for 5.2, even if I'm still dealing with review churn on the later
> parts of my v5 series (there has been a lot of rebasing from earlier
> review comments, so v5 is currently still the most recent version that
> I was able to run demos with, although I hope to post the rest of v6
> soon).

I'm still not persuaded that pushing any API without implementation is a
good idea. (No, test driver implementation does not count). If the
consensus of others is that it's good to go then go ahead, but I want to
voice this concern here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20190326/ee103cb3/attachment-0001.sig>