[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] virnuma: Assume numa_bitmask_isbitset() exists



On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 01:45:11PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This function was introduced in the 2.0.6 release which happened
> in December 2010. I think it is safe to assume that all libnuma
> we deal with have the function.

Yeah, there's a fair bit of historical baggage we could clean up. I
mean we're still asking for

# define NUMA_VERSION1_COMPATIBILITY 1

which is probably not relevant since RHEL6

> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn redhat com>
> ---
>  meson.build        | 5 +----
>  src/util/virnuma.c | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange redhat com>


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]