On Sep 25, 2020, at 4:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange redhat com> wrote:
I wrote this up and examined the `virsh version` output for several
For Windows Server 2016 that I previously mentioned, its version number
is 10.0.14393. `virsh version` displays it as 1000.14.393.
The first version of Windows that supported Hyper-V is Windows Server
2008. Its version number is 6.0.6001, which `virsh version` displays as
600.6.1. Would you prefer it to visually preserve more of the “6001”, and
produce 600.600.1 as the result?