[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 3] Transition back to connect_by_classname()

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Dan Smith wrote:
> A more formal version of the last set, this time as a proposed change
> instead of an RFC.  Some testing of the first patch would be good to make
> sure that I didn't change a provider name to be incongruent with what is
> in the registration files.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
>   
I think this set looks good - using the libvirt_cim_init() call is a 
nice way to handle this.   +1

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert at us.ibm.com