[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Add the missing Address value in NetRASD init

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Dan Smith wrote:
> DK> Don't we need to include the changeset number and revision number
> DK> before including this field ?  I think if we run this version on
> DK> the F9, will it not fail ?
> 
> No, it won't fail just because you give it more information than it
> needs, it just won't use that value.

Yep, this worked fine for me on F9 with a release rpm.

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com