[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV & KVM support

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> libvirt-cim-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-21 23:16:27:
> 
>  > Guo Lian Yun wrote:
>  > > # HG changeset patch
>  > > # User Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
>  > > # Date 1208746833 -28800
>  > > # Node ID 359a198f236c0733587423009200fcde5c2a02f3
>  > > # Parent  0d31dff13ae341fd6515dc844ee98c7b5300b71d
>  > > [TEST] .2# rebased VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent.02 for XenFV
>  > & KVM support
>  > >
>  > > Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
>  > >
>  >
>  > This fails for me on F9 using KVM and latest sources.
> 
>   This fails because of the InstanceID of ProcResourceAllocationSettingData,
>   the  "proc_rasd"  is set by '%s/%s' %(test_dom,0) in 02, which can be 
> passed
>   on Xen, actually, the InstanceID has to be update as  %(test_dom, 
> "proc"), right?
>   Then it passes on KVM, fails on Xen. Below is the output of wbemein.

I forgot to note in my previous mail - the patch worked for me when I 
tested with Xen.

> 
>   wbemein 
> http://root:password@localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData
>   
> localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/0"
>   
> localhost:5988/root/virt:Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData.InstanceID="Domain-0/1"

Are you testing with current sources?

> 
>   I will fix the InstanceID in tc, then would you please apply it?  
>    

I didn't apply that patch yet - the commit message confused me (see my 
other mail).

Thanks!

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com