[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] During a migrate, grab xml, do migration, define at the end

[Jay Gagnon]

Dan Smith wrote:
> JG> And we're okay with that failing? Not questioning the validity,
> JG> just confirming intent.
>
> Yeah, I think so, because it means that either (1) the domain has
> already been undefined (which is okay) or (2) that we'll end up with
> the domain on both the remote and local machine.  Either of these are
> better than dropping the domain on the floor (i.e. not having it
> defined in either place and it appearing to just, well, disappear.
> Agreed?
>
>   

It's pretty clear that worst-case is dropping it on the floor, I just 
wasn't sure what our position was on having a domain on both machines.  
I suppose there's no data loss, and the user can always go, "What are 
you doing there?" and get rid of the stale one later.  Works for me.

-- 

-Jay