[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Fix RASD provider unregistration

Kaitlin Rupert kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Nov 12 17:08:12 UTC 2008


Dan Smith wrote:
> KR> That's a good idea, although you still have the problem of order.  The
> KR> intermediate abstract class needs to be first in the list (so that is
> KR> is registered before its subclasses).
> 
> It's probably a good idea to unregister the classes in the opposite
> order anyway, don't you think?  That way if you have dependencies that
> you have to maintain, you can do that in the list.  If we modify
> provider_register.sh to reverse the list if we're doing a de-register,
> then it should be good, right?
> 

Yeah, that'd work.  Good idea =)

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list