[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Adding verification for DestroySystem() of the domain

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
> 
> 
> Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I took a look at this test, and you're right - the reason it's 
>>>> failing is because DestroySystem() is also undefined the guest. So 
>>>> the answer here is to modify the test so that it doesn't call 
>>>> undefine(). Also, make sure the guest isn't in the inactive domain 
>>>> list either.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure why you want to XFAIL the test, as DestroySystem() is doing 
>>>> what is expected.
>>>>
>>> I thought DestroySystem() is equivalent to "virsh destroy" command 
>>> which would just destroy a running domain which was defined and started.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nope, DestroySystem() does a "virsh destroy" and "virsh undefine". If 
>> you look at the System Virtualization Profile (DSP1042) under the 
>> heading " 8.2.2 CIM_VirtualSystemManagementService.DestroySystem( ) 
>> Method (Conditional)", DestroySystem() is defined as:
>>
>> "The execution of the DestroySystem( ) method shall effect the 
>> destruction of the referenced virtual system
>> and all related virtual system configurations, including snapshots."
> Oh! yeah I read this today. Its been long time I read the DSP1042. 
> Thanks for the clarifications.
> Updated patch on its way.
> 

No problem =)  Thanks for updating the patch!

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com