[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Adding verification for DestroySystem() of the domain

[Deepti B Kalakeri]

Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
>>>
>>> I took a look at this test, and you're right - the reason it's 
>>> failing is because DestroySystem() is also undefined the guest. So 
>>> the answer here is to modify the test so that it doesn't call 
>>> undefine(). Also, make sure the guest isn't in the inactive domain 
>>> list either.
>>>
>>> Not sure why you want to XFAIL the test, as DestroySystem() is doing 
>>> what is expected.
>>>
>> I thought DestroySystem() is equivalent to "virsh destroy" command 
>> which would just destroy a running domain which was defined and started.
>>
>>
>
> Nope, DestroySystem() does a "virsh destroy" and "virsh undefine". If 
> you look at the System Virtualization Profile (DSP1042) under the 
> heading " 8.2.2 CIM_VirtualSystemManagementService.DestroySystem( ) 
> Method (Conditional)", DestroySystem() is defined as:
>
> "The execution of the DestroySystem( ) method shall effect the 
> destruction of the referenced virtual system
> and all related virtual system configurations, including snapshots."
Oh! yeah I read this today. Its been long time I read the DSP1042. 
Thanks for the clarifications.
Updated patch on its way.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Deepti B. Kalakeri
IBM Linux Technology Center
deeptik at linux.vnet.ibm.com