suspending a process when audit resource are not available

[Stephen Smalley]

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 21:56, Chris Wright wrote:
> This adds a requirement to the calling location, namely that it can
> sleep.  I don't think that requirement is safe without some code
> auditing.  Also, I don't recall that all audit_log_lost callers are in
> the relevant context.

It is certainly not safe for current usage of the audit subsystem by
SELinux.

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds at epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency