Two netlink patches
Chris Wright
chrisw at osdl.org
Wed Dec 15 22:45:17 UTC 2004
* Serge E. Hallyn (serue at us.ibm.com) wrote:
> I wasn't. Certainly from a capability.ko point of view we would want
> PF_SUPERPRIV set if an AUDIT_ADD is done. On the other hand, asking all
> security modules to authorize CAP_SYS_ADMIN for the audit role seems
> misguided if we eventually want to create a separate audit role.
role or capability? if latter, yes, we do. CAP_SYS_ADMIN is an
abomination ;-)
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
More information about the Linux-audit
mailing list