Two netlink patches

Chris Wright chrisw at osdl.org
Wed Dec 15 22:45:17 UTC 2004


* Serge E. Hallyn (serue at us.ibm.com) wrote:
> I wasn't.  Certainly from a capability.ko point of view we would want
> PF_SUPERPRIV set if an AUDIT_ADD is done.  On the other hand, asking all
> security modules to authorize CAP_SYS_ADMIN for the audit role seems
> misguided if we eventually want to create a separate audit role.

role or capability?  if latter, yes, we do.  CAP_SYS_ADMIN is an
abomination ;-)

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net




More information about the Linux-audit mailing list