[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

VFS hooks analysis (pass 1)



Hello,

I've been investigating audit's needs for VFS hook placement, to
determine whether audit would require additional events or additional
information about events, other than what is currently provided by
Inotify.  

I've written up my findings in hopes that some of you who may be more
familiar with the situation than I can correct my mistakes, and that
we can all be on the same page with regard to audit's needs.

At this point, I haven't addressed the issue of race conditions.  For
the purpose of the first pass, I make the assumption that the current
fsnotify hook placement is sufficient.  I'll address the possibility
of race conditions in a second pass.

Background:

The purpose of the VFS hooks is to capture information about an
object's identity.  In this implementation, identity means inode and
name.  Identity information is needed for filtering and for log record
detail.

To narrow the field, I limited the set of syscalls to those which are
defined by CAPP as security-relevant and are also filesystem-related.
I believe this is the correct list:

    sys_access
    sys_chdir
    sys_chmod
    sys_chown
    sys_creat
    sys_execve
    sys_fchmod
    sys_fchown
    sys_fremovexattr
    sys_fsetxattr
    sys_lchown
    sys_link
    sys_lremovexattr
    sys_lsetxattr
    sys_mkdir
    sys_mknod
    sys_mount
    sys_open
    sys_removexattr
    sys_rename
    sys_rmdir
    sys_setxattr
    sys_swapon
    sys_symlink
    sys_truncate
    sys_unlink
    sys_utime(s)

Available Object Identity Info:

The upstream audit code uses getname() and path_lookup() hooks to
collect object identity information during syscall processing.  This
is sufficient for the following syscalls:

    sys_access
    sys_chdir
    sys_chmod
    sys_chown
    sys_execve
    sys_lchown
    sys_link
    sys_lremovexattr
    sys_lsetxattr
    sys_removexattr
    sys_setxattr
    sys_swapon
    sys_truncate
    sys_utime(s)

Lacking Object Identity Info:

The information audit needs isn't available when path_lookup is called
with LOOKUP_PARENT, or when getname/path_lookup are not called at all.
In these situations, audit needs more VFS hooks to get the necessary
information.

Attribute Changes:

The getname/path_lookup hooks are never called for these syscalls:

    sys_fchmod
    sys_fchown
    sys_fremovexattr
    sys_fsetxattr

The fsnotify_change() and fsnotify_xattr() hooks capture the relevant
dentry, so the dentry's name & inode could be passed to the event
callback.

Mounts:

For sys_mount, audit does not currently capture the pathname for the
device.  This is because getname is not called before path_lookup.  We
could modify audit_inode() to save the name from path_lookup for
"nameless" inodes.  Note the FIXME in audit_inode().

The rest of the syscalls are mostly lacking information due to
path_lookup being called with LOOKUP_PARENT.

Created Objects:

    sys_creat
    sys_mkdir
    sys_mknod
    sys_open

The fsnotify_create() and fsnotify_mkdir() hooks have the same
placement as audit_notify_watch(), but audit needs the dentry's inode.
The fsnotify hooks could be modified to capture the dentry, instead of
just the dentry->d_name.name.

Removed Objects:

    sys_rmdir
    sys_unlink 

The fsnotify_inoderemove() hook provides the inode, but see note below
on capturing attempted removals.

Symlinks:

    sys_symlink

The inodes for the target path and symlink are not available from the
getname/path_lookup hoooks.  The PATH records do not indicate which
name is the symlink.  Maybe this isn't necessary since you can tell
from the syscall args.

As previously mentioned, the fsnotify_create() hook could be modified
to capture the dentry instead of the dentry->d_name.name.  This would
provide audit with the symlink's inode.

I haven't found a good way to capture the target inode.  We don't do
it in the current implementation, which means we don't log events when
someone makes a symlink to a watched inode or pathname.  It seems like
we should, though.  

Renames:

    sys_rename

The inode for the relevant object is not available from the
getname/path_lookup hooks.  There is also no way to indicate the old
name versus the new name, other than by the syscall args.

The fsnotify_move() hook could be modified to capture the old and new
dentrys, instead of just the names, which would provide audit with the
inode (twice).  Inotify provides separate to/from events.

Capturing Unsuccessful Attempts:

CAPP dictates that audit must capture unsuccessful attempts from open,
rename, truncate, and unlink.  The open and truncate calls are a
non-issue, the inode is obtained from the path_lookup hook.

The rename and unlink calls present the problem.  Since the inode
wouldn't be captured unless the rename/remove was successful, an
inode-based filter wouldn't catch unsuccessful attempts.

Summary:

To summarize, I haven't found a situation requiring the current
permission() and exec_permission_lite() hooks.

The issues seem to be with symlinks and logging unsuccessful
rename/remove attempts.

I can think of three possible solutions for the latter:

    (1) Require filters based on filenames to capture unsuccessful
        attempts.  This seems undesirable.

    (2) Have an audit-specific hook in may_delete(), as is currently
        done, but have it tie in to inode-based filters as well.

    (3) Request an additional Inotify event that would not be included
        in IN_ALL_EVENTS, so wouldn't impact Inotify's other users.

I think 2 or 3 are our best options, with the answer likely depending
on what Inotify is willing to add.  It is probably doable to add
audit-specific hooks if they are few and if Inotify isn't interested.

I do not yet have a solution for capturing the target inode from a
symlink operation.  However since it's not currently done, maybe it
isn't a hard requirement?

I'd appreciate any comments on my analysis.

Thanks,
Amy


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]