[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Supplemental Groups

--- Chris Wright <chrisw osdl org> wrote:

> It's CAPP vs. useful ;-)

Then why bother?

> > This may be an audit trail, but it ain't a
> > security audit trail! The fact that an event
> > occurred without the information about the
> > subject and the object is not sufficient for
> > any analysis. What is the point of this
> > exercise? Without the subject and object
> > security attributes, especially those used
> > to make the access in question, what is this
> > good for?
> Most of these things are there, we're just
> identifying what's missing.
> I don't think anyone believes they aren't useful
> (however, we won't be
> tracking which bit gave access, that'd have to be
> deduced).

Why not? Other systems do it. Dickins, even
MicroSoft can do that!

Casey Schaufler
casey schaufler-ca com

Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]