[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: audit 0.9.12 released



On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 09:19 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I don't think we even need the state code. We just need a yes/no
> answer. This reduces even more by deleting the above and not passing
> the state var.

Actually we need a 'yes/no/unmatched' answer. We could change it as you
suggest, and if we do that we should probably also change
audit_filter_rules() in the same fashion -- but let's not bother.

-- 
dwmw2


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]