[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: syscalls not known by auditctl



On Tuesday 01 March 2005 18:12, Debora Velarde wrote:
> There are some syscall numbers that are not known by auditctl.

Looking at it, I think that the rule goes into the kernel fine, its just a 
display problem. It tries to lookup the name, but when that fails, it should 
print the number instead of a blank.

Will fix it to print the number on failed lookups in next release.

-Steve


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]