[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] (#6 U2) filesystem auditing



On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 17:50 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Presumably that point is that the hooks are what's of most interest to
> Linux developers in general; the actual audit code can be treated as a
> black box so can reasonably be posted separately.

At least with LSM we received complaints that the real long term
maintenance impact of the hooks couldn't be properly interpreted without
seeing hook function implementations too, e.g. to see what
assumptions/dependencies they had.
  
-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
National Security Agency


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]