[RFC][PATCH 0/2] (#6 U2) filesystem auditing

[David Woodhouse]

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 11:50 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> At least with LSM we received complaints that the real long term
> maintenance impact of the hooks couldn't be properly interpreted
> without seeing hook function implementations too, e.g. to see what
> assumptions/dependencies they had.

That's entirely valid -- I wouldn't suggest that we show the hooks alone
_without_ the audit code. But splitting them into separate patches for
clarity is a good thing.

-- 
dwmw2