Opinion please

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 16:55 -0500, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > But I'm not sure whether netlink_unicast is a problem (sure looks like
> > it - it puts current on a waitqueue for one thing) or what you should do
> > about it.  You might just need to build a list of things to send under
> > the rcu_read_lock(), then send each element once you rcu_read_unlock().
> 
> Ok, I took this advice, and just went ahead and implemented something very 
> similar.  Good idea Serge.  Thanks.  

Yeah, that seems sanest to me.

>  (plus I'm going to patch up to rc4-mm2).

Please don't do that. At this point in time we really need you to be
working directly on the 2.6.9 RPM kernel primarily. Work on the audit.39
kernel which was just uploaded to the yum repository.

-- 
dwmw2