[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FYI: 2.6.13.3 Memory leak, names_cache



On 10/7/05, Steve Grubb <sgrubb redhat com> wrote:
> On Friday 07 October 2005 12:49, Timothy R. Chavez wrote:
> > Shouldn't this type of message be CCed to this list?
> 
> Offhand, I don't see the correlation between names_cache and audit
system.

Talked to Steve about this on IRC...  For everyone else, read the rest
of the thread and you'll see that this was caused by audit syscall code.


:-Dustin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]