[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: audit_receive_skb



On Monday 12 September 2005 13:28, Chris Wright wrote:
> In aduit_receive_skb (just basic sanity checks on skb length and netlink
> msg header info).

OK, I see.

> > > It's void upstream, btw.
> >
> > If something can go wrong, we should detect the problem and return 1. If
> > there is nothing that can go wrong, we should make it void. I guess
> > that's what I'm getting at.
>
> Going wrong == packet we can't handle.  So we just drop it.  

Does this send a NACK back to auditctl?

> I agree, and it's already done upstream, but I don't think it's worth
> spinning a new kernel for.

I think we are at the point where we are starting the new development. Maybe 
this doesn't go into a .89 kernel, but a .1 kernel for the new development 
cycle.

Thanks,
-Steve


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]