[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages



On Thursday 16 February 2006 10:29, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Except for what other code should do about NULL pointers in output.  If
> they defer it to vsnprintf, they will end up with <NULL> in the output.
> So should Tim's code be checking for !ctx and outputting (null) there as
> well?

Yes, I think that would be consistent will all the other audit code.

-Steve


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]