[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH] new audit rule interface



On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:14 -0500, Amy Griffis wrote:
> The more I think about it, I don't really like xprt/transport.
> Looking through the kernel sources, the only code that uses xprt
> meaning transport is RPC code.  I'd prefer to avoid any unwarranted
> associations with RPC.  I also don't think transport accurately
> describes what's happening here.
> 
> How about audit_rule_data?  I would personally prefer that to
> audit_rule_xprt.

I like audit_rule_data better than *_xprt.  

Or even audit_rule_ext (for "extended").

:-Dustin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]