[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: type=SOCKADDR record missing for socketcall(accept)?



On Thursday 23 March 2006 09:08, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
>  I noticed that a socketcall(bind) and socketcall(connect) event contain a
>  record of type=SOCKADDR, but I cannot see one for a system call event
>  associated with socketcall(accept).  Recording the sockaddr of an accepted
>  socket is important for cross platform information flow analys

Thanks for pointing this out. The following patch should address this.


Signed-off-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb redhat com>

diff -urp linux-2.6.15.x86_64.orig/net/socket.c linux-2.6.15.x86_64/net/socket.c
--- linux-2.6.15.x86_64.orig/net/socket.c	2006-03-23 10:16:44.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.x86_64/net/socket.c	2006-03-23 10:27:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ int move_addr_to_user(void *kaddr, int k
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if(len)
 	{
+		if (audit_sockaddr(klen, kaddr))
+			return -ENOMEM;
 		if(copy_to_user(uaddr,kaddr,len))
 			return -EFAULT;
 	}



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]