[PATCH 2/5] The error message of "-1" in field checking isnot suit

[Zhang Xiliang]

Hello Steve, 

The error message of "-1" is "-F missing = for ...".
The opration isnot only "=". 
So I think "F missing opration for" is better.


Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <zhangxiliang at cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 src/auditctl.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/auditctl.c b/src/auditctl.c
index 3958afb..a19bd14 100644
--- a/src/auditctl.c
+++ b/src/auditctl.c
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int setopt(int count, char *vars[])
 					audit_permadded = 1;
 				break;
 			case -1:
-				fprintf(stderr, "-F missing = for %s\n", 
+				fprintf(stderr, "-F missing opration for %s\n", 
 					optarg);
 				retval = -1;
 				break;