[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: new auparse question



On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 04:49:46 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 04:31:48 PM LC Bruzenak wrote:
> > So my question is - is this a bug (I would think so) or should I always
> > precede any auparse call sequence with at least one fresh
> > auparse_first_field call?
> 
> A segfault is a bug as far as this library is concerned. I know other
> libraries let you segfault if you do something wrong. I'll try to make a
> reproducer and see what's going on.

Patch applied to svn:
https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/567

-Steve


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]