New draft standards

[Burn Alting]

I use a proprietary ELK-like system based on ausearch's -i option. I would
like to see some variant outputs from ausearch that "packages" events into
parse-friendly formats (json, xml) that also incorporates the local
transformations Steve proposes. I believe this would be the most generic
solution to support centralised log management.

I am travelling now, but can write up a specification for review next week.

Burn Alting

On 15 Dec 2015 4:13 am, <Kevin.Dienst at usbank.com> wrote:
>
> ELK
> Splunk
>
> We use a proprietary vendor product that migrates data into an HDFS store
via RabbitMQ based collectors and dumps them in raw form. From there I have
access to all the usual "big data" tools albeit I'm not using Flume just
yet, we're still trying to get a handle on operationalizing all the various
big data component so that data science developers can focus on development
instead of operations and support of the hardware/software ecosystem.
>
> Kevin D Dienst
>
>
>
>
> From:        Joe Wulf <joe_wulf at yahoo.com>
> To:        "linux-audit at redhat.com" <linux-audit at redhat.com>
> Date:        12/14/2015 10:51 AM
> Subject:        Re: New draft standards
> Sent by:        linux-audit-bounces at redhat.com
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
> The last place I was at heavily used Splunk and then transitioned to
dual-routing a substantial portion of the logs from across the
infrastructure to ELK, as well.
>
> -Joe
>
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com>
> To: F Rafi <farhanible at gmail.com>; "linux-audit at redhat.com" <
linux-audit at redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:34 AM
> Subject: Re: New draft standards
>
> But I guess this gives me an opportunity to ask the community what tools
they
> are using for audit log collection and viewing? Its been a couple years
since
> e had this discussion on the mail list and I think some things have
changed.
>
> Do people use ELK?
> Apache Flume?
> Something else?
>
> It might be possible to write a plugin to translate the audit logs into
the
> native format of these tools.
>
>
>
> -Steve
>
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
>
>
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/attachments/20151215/0256f3d0/attachment.htm>