[Linux-cachefs] Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Thu Aug 9 18:21:21 UTC 2007
James Morris <jmorris at namei.org> wrote:
> > + u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
>
> To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an
> error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.
Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
return an error?
David
More information about the Linux-cachefs
mailing list