[Linux-cachefs] Re: [PATCH 11/14] CacheFiles: Permit an inode's security ID to be obtained [try #2]
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Thu Aug 9 18:42:53 UTC 2007
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, David Howells wrote:
> James Morris <jmorris at namei.org> wrote:
>
> > > + u32 (*inode_get_secid)(struct inode *inode);
> >
> > To maintain API consistency, please return an int which only acts as an
> > error code, and returning the secid via a *u32 function parameter.
>
> Does that apply to *all* the functions, irrespective of whether or not they
> return an error?
LSM is theoretically an API, so we generally don't know if a security
module will return an error or not.
If they were simply calls directly into SElinux, where we could always
know the semantics, then that would be a different story.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>
More information about the Linux-cachefs
mailing list