On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:03:39PM -0700, micah nerren wrote: > We have used nolock instead of gulm, still on the pool device over the > HBA, and received a crash. Attached are two traces of the crashes. We > edited the code sprinkling printk's throughout to get some output. > > Using lock_nolock instead of lock_gulm still crashes, but slightly > differently. See koops-nolock.txt er, you might want to double check this run, looking at the oops and loging, it looks like it is still trying to use gulm. the line: Gulm v6.0.0 (built Aug 5 2004 16:27:11) installed in the file: koops-nolock.txt lead me to believe this, along with the lock_gulm sysmbols in the oops. i could be imaging things too... -- Michael Conrad Tadpol Tilstra At night as I lay in bed looking at the stars I thought 'Where the hell is the ceiling?'
Description: PGP signature