[Linux-cluster] Re: [cgl_discussion] Re: [dcl_discussion] Clustersummit materials
Steven Dake
sdake at mvista.com
Thu Aug 12 17:42:16 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 02:57, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2004-08-11T11:46:03,
> Steven Dake <sdake at mvista.com> said:
>
> > If we can't live with the cluster services in userland (although I'm
> > still not convinced), then atleast the group messaging protocol in the
> > kernel could be based upon 20 years of research in group messaging and
> > work properly under _all_ fault scenarios.
>
> Right. Another important alternative maybe the Transis group
> communication suite, which has been released as GPL/LGPL now.
>
> This all just highlights that we need to think about communication some
> more before we can tackle it sensibly, but of course I'll be glad if
> someone proves me wrong and Just Does It ;-)
>
agreed... Transis in kernel would be a fine alternative to openais gmi
in kernel.
Speaking of transis, is the code posted anywhere? I'd like to have a
look.
Thanks
-steve
>
> Sincerely,
> Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb at suse.de>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list