[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: [Linux-cluster] A very basic question



This even for fiber-channel SAN?

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces redhat com
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Jonathan E
Brassow
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:07 PM
To: linux clistering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] A very basic question

yes, you would.

if not using GFS, nodes will cache the info they read and will not get 
updates of things that change on other nodes.  I'm pretty sure it 
doesn't work even if you mount the file systems read-only... but I 
could be wrong about that.

So, you would populate the storage and then mount the rest of the nodes?

  brassow
On Dec 11, 2004, at 12:12 AM, Duncan Morgan wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I know some might consider this a very stupid question but I will ask
> anyways because its answer will help me understand GFS a little bit
> better.
>
> If all nodes in a SAN environment to only read (no writes), would GFS
> actually be needed?
>
> Sorry for the question in advance :))
>
> Duncan
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

!DSPAM:41be0440174248364188209!


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]