[Linux-cluster] GFS: more simple performance numbers

Matt Mitchell mmitchell at virtualproperties.com
Tue Oct 19 18:51:33 UTC 2004


> Single node performance is heavily dependent on the lock manager(!).  
> How about with nolock?

I'm also see what could be described as abysmal performance with the 
GFS, even with nolock on a single system.  I'm using the 20040913 
snapshot that was packaged for Debian by Bastian Blank.  For sake of 
comparison I was attempting to copy the linux-2.6.8.1.tar file to the 
GFS partition to attempt to reproduce this timing test, and it took 
nearly 5 minutes just to copy the one file.  This is on some slightly 
older hardware (P3-800) but I can't imagine that GFS would require a 
supercomputer to run...maybe it does?

Raw I/O and other filesystems on the same storage device work fine, so I 
have to point the finger at GFS...but I don't know where to begin in 
trying to track down the problem.  I guess I should try the latest code 
from CVS first, but I'd love to have any hints or pointers the list 
could provide...

Thanks in advance,

Matt Mitchell




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list