[Linux-cluster] GFS: more simple performance numbers
Matt Mitchell
mmitchell at virtualproperties.com
Tue Oct 19 18:51:33 UTC 2004
> Single node performance is heavily dependent on the lock manager(!).
> How about with nolock?
I'm also see what could be described as abysmal performance with the
GFS, even with nolock on a single system. I'm using the 20040913
snapshot that was packaged for Debian by Bastian Blank. For sake of
comparison I was attempting to copy the linux-2.6.8.1.tar file to the
GFS partition to attempt to reproduce this timing test, and it took
nearly 5 minutes just to copy the one file. This is on some slightly
older hardware (P3-800) but I can't imagine that GFS would require a
supercomputer to run...maybe it does?
Raw I/O and other filesystems on the same storage device work fine, so I
have to point the finger at GFS...but I don't know where to begin in
trying to track down the problem. I guess I should try the latest code
from CVS first, but I'd love to have any hints or pointers the list
could provide...
Thanks in advance,
Matt Mitchell
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list