[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS



> Note that this sounds like perfectly correct behavior on the part of gfs.
> The application is responsible for the necessary file locking, of course,
> while gfs is responsible for keeping the fs uncorrupted.

Well on my side, do the redhat guys see any problem with me running
gfs on my mailstore for 1m users on a fast ibm san ?

P

</N>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]