[Linux-cluster] diferent lans

Patricio Bruna V. pbruna at linuxcenterla.com
Wed May 25 19:23:54 UTC 2005


El Mié 25 May 2005 13:40, Edward Mann escribió:
> Yes,
>
> As long as each node can talk to the other.
>
> I have one node in a DMZ on a 192 network, and another on another
> network on a 172 address.
>
> So i know that this will work. Just make sure that both nodes can talk
> to each other.
>
both nodes can talk to each other, i have full conection betewn them.
but in both cman reports:

kernel: CMAN: forming a new cluster
kernel: CMAN: quorum regained, resuming activity
ccsd[7001]: Cluster is quorate.  Allowing connections.

cat /proc/cluster/nodes (node pato):
Protocol version: 5.0.1
Config version: 1
Cluster name: lc
Cluster ID: 315
Cluster Member: Yes
Membership state: Cluster-Member
Nodes: 1
Expected_votes: 1
Total_votes: 1
Quorum: 1
Active subsystems: 0
Node name: pato.linuxcenterla.com
Node addresses: 192.168.3.31

cat /proc/cluster/status (node terminal):
Protocol version: 5.0.1
Config version: 1
Cluster name: lc
Cluster ID: 315
Cluster Member: Yes
Membership state: Cluster-Member
Nodes: 1
Expected_votes: 1
Total_votes: 1
Quorum: 1
Active subsystems: 0
Node name: terminal.linuxcenterla.com
Node addresses: 192.168.1.200

any ideas?


-- 
Patricio Bruna
pbruna at linuxcenterla.com
RHCE/RHCI
Jefe Soporte y Operaciones LinuxCenter S.A.
Canada 239, 5to piso, Providencia, Chile
http://www.linuxcenterla.com +56-2-2745000
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20050525/103b4034/attachment.sig>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list